UN Human Rights Committee raises 'serious concerns' over India travel ban

  • 📰 9NewsAUS
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 57 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 72%

Holiday Holiday Headlines News

The UN Human Rights committee says they see 'few, if any' circumstances to justify depriving citizens of their right to return home. 9News

The UN Human Rights Committee on Wednesday raised "serious concerns" about the Morrison government's move to ban its own citizens from returning from India and criminalise breaches.

"The UN Human Rights Committee, which oversees implementation of the ICCPR, has emphasised the narrow authority to refuse nationals' return, and considers that there are few, if any, circumstances in which deprivation of the right to enter one's own country could be reasonable," he said. Sydney designer Aviram Vijh said his cousin was one of them, stuck for six months after travelling to his father's funeral."This new rule that prevents people at the moment from India from coming here, etc, that's just the icing on the cake, so to say, in a negative way."My cousin's been trying for six months … because there are no tickets, the tickets get cancelled, you have to fly business class.

"I think it's highly unlikely. Highly unlikely," he told Today, saying his priority was to keep Australia safe and prevent a local COVID-19 outbreak. Mr Nichols told 9News.com.au the latest comments further bolstered any potential case against the India travel ban, saying the first priority was to challenge it under Australian, law, international law or both.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The UN_HRC UNHumanRights can shove it! All they want the virus to spread so they be part of the group who want control. your just growing support for ScottMorrisonMP 😂 supportourPM. mj_slats SkyNewsAust

No

But, but, but...what about the opinions of the 2/3 people in the country who believe they are a the greater good? Surely the UN has considered their safety before harshly judging Australia's noble sacrifice of human rights.

The UN needs to keep its opinions to itself honestly.

To be fair, you only have to spend 14 days in a country that is not India before returning home.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in HOLİDAY

Holiday Holiday Latest News, Holiday Holiday Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Human rights lawyer 'outraged' by 'unconstitutional' India travel banRenowned human rights lawyer Geoffrey Robertson says it is unconstitutional to stop Australians returning home from India. 9News So not unconstitutional to save the indigenous Aussies from the covid that the new Aussies will bring in then....
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »

Travel ban 'unlawful on many levels': Human Rights lawyer | Sky News AustraliaThe travel ban imposed by the federal government on Indian Australians returning home is 'unlawful on so many levels' and 'contravenes' Australia's international legal obligations, according to Human Rights lawyer Rabia Siddique. \n\n'From a human rights perspective - you know 20 plus years practising in this area - I'm dumbfounded. I'm still almost in disbelief,' she told Sky News host Alan Jones.\n\n'So, very quickly - it's contravening our international legal obligations under the international covenant on civil and political rights - I would just encourage anyone to read article 12.\n\n'It is contrary to our democratic principles as a Western democracy. It is well in excess and exceeds the government's powers under the commonwealth Biosecurity Act - it is disproportionate, it is overly restrictive and intrusive as the wording of the Act details.\n\n'And it is against public law principles of consistency, transparency and due process- and of course now we know that it is being tested and challenged in the federal court as being unconstitutional.'\n\n It makes complete sense under the circumstances!!!! Did they care when Victorians not only were barred from entering nearly every other State or Territory last yr, but we were only allowed to go 5km from home and permitted 1 hr of fresh air outside of our front doors...where was the outrage for us?!?
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »