, raising fears that trade, migration and the arrival of international students might once again be disrupted, but most business and education groups – other than the Business Council of Australia – gave cautious support for the measure.
The chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Andrew McKellar, said: “Given the evolving situation in China, the government’s decision to require a negative test on departure is appropriate and accepted by business. “As such, we don’t expect testing requirements will have any great impact on our local tourism operators.”
This is very bad news. We need to get permanent migration back to the 70,000 pa that was the average in the last century. If businesses are finding it hard to get workers, they should offer better wages and conditions or close down. What does it matter if there are fewer shops?
Linguistic confusion, like the UK when international students, backpackers etc. are falsely described as 'migrants' suggesting permanence, but not true. Counted in under NOM if staying 12/16+ months, temp 'churn over' of 'net financial budget contributors' vs working age decline.
Great news for landlords.
Ffs we don't a report to say the obvious
Madness during a housing crisis. immigration migration auspol
Holiday Holiday Latest News, Holiday Holiday Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: 7NewsSydney - 🏆 16. / 63 Read more »
Source: FinancialReview - 🏆 2. / 90 Read more »